As reported earlier this week, a legislative deal to provide legal clarity to the contract private security industry regarding on-duty meal periods has been gaining significant traction. We are pleased to report that the reform package is finally in bill format – Senate Bill 529 authored by Senator Gil Cedillo (D – Los Angeles).
We encourage all members to write letters and call your legislators urging their support of the bill. Please contact William Hodges at (916) 930-0552 or via email at whodges@calsaga.org to get contact information for both your Senate and Assembly representatives. Additionally, we ask that you include your company letterhead on any correspondence and fax a copy to CALSAGA at (916) 930-0702 for our records.
Below are some talking points you can use to craft your letter and/or use when calling your legislators office:
- On behalf of [insert company name] and the California Association of Licensed Security Agencies, Guards & Associates (CALSAGA), we strongly support the on-duty meal break reform package contained in Senate Bill 529 and applaud Senator Cedillo for his leadership and effort to bring clarity to this issue.
- Due to the nature of contract private security work, the requirement for an off-duty meal period is not practical from a public safety, homeland security, or administrative perspective. From a public safety perspective, allowing or even requiring a security officer to leave his/her post unattended is essentially an advertisement to criminals that a site is unprotected.
- Administratively, because our security officers are dispersed throughout many sites, it makes it virtually impossible to designate employees from our company to drive from site to site to relieve officers to ensure mandatory meal breaks are taken.
- Furthermore, nearly all of our employees prefer to perform eight hours of work for eight hours of pay with an on-duty meal break, as opposed to having to work for eight-and-a-half hours to get eight hours of pay.
- In a post 9/11 world, security officers are increasingly being called upon to protect some of the State’s most critical infrastructure sites, from energy facilities to oil refineries. In many cases, simply their presence acts as crime deterrence.
- Until our industry gets relief on this issue, we will continue to be threatened with class action lawsuits over alleged violations. These lawsuits don’t solve anything and hurt both employees and employers.
As mentioned in past communiqué, we can’t stress enough the importance of this grassroots effort. It is absolutely imperative that legislators hear from our industry on this bill, so they clearly understand the issue from our perspective.
We thank you in advance for your support!
Recent Comments